CMS Points “In Lieu of” Companies Steering to Handle Well being-Associated Social Wants in Medicaid Managed Care


On January 4, in its most up-to-date effort to develop federal help for addressing health-related social wants (HRSNs), the Facilities for Medicare & Medicaid Companies (CMS) issued steerage to make clear an present choice for states to handle HRSNs via the usage of “in lieu of” companies and settings insurance policies in Medicaid managed care. This selection is designed to assist states provide various advantages that take purpose at a variety of unmet HRSNs, corresponding to housing instability and meals insecurity, and to assist enrollees keep their protection and enhance well being outcomes. 


“In lieu of” companies can be utilized as instant or longer-term substitutes for state-covered companies or settings to offset potential future acute or institutional care and enhance the standard and well being outcomes for the enrollee. The latest steerage builds on the 2016 Medicaid and Kids’s Well being Insurance coverage Program (CHIP) managed care last rule, which formally acknowledged states’ and managed care plans’ skills to cowl “in lieu of” companies and considerably expanded its flexibility by allowing protection of companies in an establishment for psychological illness (IMD) with sure limitations. The ultimate rule required that states’ “in lieu of” companies should be medically acceptable and cost-effective, prevents managed care plans from requiring companies for enrollees as an alternative choice to a state plan coated service or setting, and components companies’ utilization and precise prices into capitation charges.

States and CMS are utilizing 1115 waiver authority to pursue “in lieu of” companies and different HRSN-related companies and helps. In latest months, CMS authorized 1115 waivers in ArizonaArkansasMassachusetts, and Oregon that embrace “in lieu of” companies proposals to handle HRSNs. Whereas a number of states at present use “in lieu of” companies to cowl psychological well being and substance use dysfunction therapy in IMD settings, CMS explains that further steerage is important at the moment for non-IMD and different kinds of companies, together with these to cut back the necessity for future expensive state plan-covered companies.

Steering: CMS’ Six Ideas on Acceptable and Environment friendly Use of “In Lieu Of” Companies

In steerage addressed to state Medicaid administrators, CMS clarifies its expectations for the usage of “in lieu of” companies and settings and offers a coverage framework for states as a way to qualify for a Part 1115 waiver. The steerage additionally establishes the next six ideas to information states on this space: (i) Medicaid program alignment, (ii) cost-effectiveness, (iii) medical appropriateness, (iv) enrollee rights and protections, (v) monitoring and oversight, and (vi) retrospective analysis (when relevant).

CMS has developed these clarifying parameters to make sure sufficient evaluation of the choice companies and settings prior to make use of, ongoing monitoring for acceptable utilization and enrollee protections, and monetary guardrails to make sure accountability and stop inappropriate use of Medicaid sources. States should fulfill every of the beneath necessities to acquire CMS approval of states’ managed care plan contracts that embrace “in lieu of” companies in accordance with 42 CFR § 438.3(a).

  1. “In lieu of” companies should advance the goals of the Medicaid program
  2. “In lieu of” companies should be price efficient
  3. A quick description of every “in lieu of” companies within the Medicaid managed care program, and whether or not the service was offered as a profit in the course of the base information interval;
  4. The projected “in lieu of” companies price proportion, which is calculated by dividing the portion of the entire capitation charges that might be attributable to a service, excluding brief time period stays in an IMD, for a particular managed care program by the projected whole capitation funds for that program;
  5. An outline of how the “in lieu of” companies (each materials and non-material affect) have been taken into consideration within the improvement of the projected profit prices, and if this method was completely different than that for any of the opposite companies within the classes of service; and
  6. An actuarial report that features the ultimate “in lieu of” companies price proportion, the precise plan prices for companies for the particular managed care program, the portion of the entire capitation funds that’s attributable to companies (excluding a brief time period keep in an IMD), and a abstract of the particular managed care plan prices for delivering companies primarily based on claims and encounter information. The report must be submitted to CMS no later than 2 years after the completion of the contract yr that features companies.
  7. “In lieu of” companies should be medically acceptable
  8. The title and definition of every “in lieu of” companies and the companies or settings which they substitute, together with the related coding;
  9. Clinically oriented definitions for the goal inhabitants;
  10. A contractual requirement for the managed care plans to make the most of a constant course of to make sure that a supplier utilizing skilled judgement determines the medical appropriateness of the service for every enrollee; and
  11. If the projected price proportion is larger than 1.5 %, states should present an outline of the method to find out medical appropriateness.
  12. “In lieu of” companies should be offered in a fashion that preserves enrollee rights and protections
  13. “In lieu of” companies should be topic to acceptable monitoring and oversight
  14. An actuarial report offered by the state’s actuary certifying the ultimate “in lieu of” service price proportion particular to every managed care program as outlined above;
  15. Written notification inside 30 days of figuring out that an “in lieu of” service is not a medically acceptable or cost-effective substitute, or for some other areas of non-compliance;
  16. An attestation to audit encounter, grievances, appeals, and state truthful listening to information to make sure accuracy, completeness, and timeliness, together with information to stratify utilization by demographics when doable; and
  17. Documentation essential for CMS to know how the utilization, price, and financial savings for an “in lieu of” service was thought of within the improvement of actuarially sound capitation charges.
  18. “In lieu of” companies should be topic to retrospective analysis (when relevant)

CMS would require states with last “in lieu of” companies price percentages higher than 1.5 % to submit a retrospective analysis for every managed care program that features “in lieu of” companies. At a minimal, evaluations ought to embrace the next data:

  • The affect every service had on utilization of state plan-covered companies or settings, together with related price financial savings, developments in managed care plan and enrollee use of every service, and affect of every service on high quality of care;
  • An evaluation of whether or not encounter information helps the state’s willpower that every service is a medically acceptable and cost-effective substitute;
  • The ultimate “in lieu of” companies price proportion per the actuarial report;
  • Appeals, grievances, and state truthful hearings information individually for every service together with quantity, motive, decision standing, and developments; and
  • The affect every service had on well being fairness initiatives and efforts undertaken by the state to mitigate well being disparities.

Evaluations should be submitted to CMS no later than 24 months after the completion of the primary 5 contract years that embrace “in lieu of” companies. If the retrospective analysis identifies substantive points, CMS could decide whether or not to allow the state to take corrective motion to treatment the deficiency or terminate the service.

Subsequent Steps

States that use “in lieu of” companies for his or her Medicaid managed care contracting may have till the contract score interval starting on or after January 1, 2024, to evolve with this steerage for present companies. Efficient January 4, 2023, any state managed care plan contract that features new “in lieu of” companies should conform to the steerage.

The steerage demonstrates the Administration’s curiosity and dedication to bolster federal help for reimbursement of “in lieu of” companies to handle HRSNs. States can leverage present federal coverage flexibilities to supply expanded advantages to Medicaid beneficiaries and enhance inhabitants well being. As well as, the steerage could provide alternatives for plans, suppliers, well being expertise firms, and others to enhance entry to health-related social care companies for weak populations.

For extra data on how the steerage may affect your group, please contact the professionals listed beneath, or your common Crowell & Moring contact.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here