a danger issue for suicide?


Charges of youth suicide have elevated in lots of components of the world, with regarding tendencies in self-harm and suicide behaviour being noticed notably amongst younger girls (Glenn et al., 2020; World Well being Organisation, 2019). There are a number of causes for this: unprecedented charges of psychological misery, better tutorial stress, charges of peer battle and cyberbullying, and for a lot of younger folks, psychological well being assist is inaccessible, costly, and extremely stigmatised. Alongside these danger components, some have argued that will increase in suicide and self-harm are related to younger folks spending an elevated period of time on-line, notably on social media (Macrynikola et al., 2021; Marchant et al., 2017).

The extent to which on-line interactions, and the web extra broadly, play a job in youth suicide is advanced. For some younger folks, proof factors to social media getting used to advertise distressing content material and share unhelpful self-harm or suicide-related data, doubtlessly resulting in imitative behaviour or contagion (Arendt et al., 2019; Dunlop, Extra & Romer, 2011; Hawton et al., 2020; Yellow, 2020). Nevertheless, for different younger folks, social media could be an necessary supply of peer-connection and support-seeking, notably for subjects which are troublesome to speak about offline or are considered taboo (Baker & Fortune, 2008; Gibson & Trnka, 2020; Lavis & Winter, 2020; Nasier, Gibson, & Trnka, 2021). A rising physique of labor additionally helps the utility of social media as a software for suicide prevention and to share useful messages and knowledge; each to customers who’re in danger themselves, in addition to those that are uncovered to danger displayed on-line by others (Robinson et al., 2016; Robinson et al., 2018, La Sala et al., 2021; La Sala et al., In Press).

Whereas there have been many cross-sectional and qualitative investigations inspecting self-reported associations between social media use and varied psychological well being outcomes, a more moderen examine has taken a special strategy. Given the combined proof concerning the web’s contribution to suicide in each grownup (Gunnell et al., 2012) and youth (Padmanathan et al., 2020) samples, Rodway et al. (2022) retrospectively explored the net experiences of younger folks aged 10 to 19 years who died by suicide within the UK between 2014 and 2016. The examine aimed to discover any variations within the antecedents and strategies of suicide for younger folks identified to have had a suicide-related on-line expertise.

Social media can play both a helpful and unhelpful role in youth suicide prevention.

Social media can play each a useful and unhelpful function in youth suicide prevention.


Knowledge have been sourced primarily from coroner inquest hearings (n=526; 88%), in addition to NHS severe incident studies (n=10) and youngster demise investigations (n=8). Primarily based on the data accessible in these studies, the authors categorised every youth suicide as having the presence or absence of an internet suicide-related expertise previous to demise. On-line suicide-related experiences have been outlined as both:

  1. Looking the web for data on suicide strategies
  2. Visiting web sites or chat rooms which will have inspired suicidal behaviour
  3. Speaking about their very own suicidal ideation or intent on-line, or
  4. Being the sufferer of on-line bullying.

Current experiences have been those who had been reported within the three months previous to the younger individual’s demise.

The authors used logistic regression fashions adjusting for gender, age, and the presence of any psychological well being situations to measure the affiliation between suicide-related on-line experiences and different demographic, social and medical traits of the younger individuals who had died by suicide. Multinomial logistic regression fashions have been used to analyse the antecedents of these identified to have had a number of suicide-related on-line experiences.

The authors thought of three teams:

  • Those that had a couple of suicide-related on-line expertise (35 folks),
  • Those that had just one suicide-related on-line expertise (93 folks), and
  • Those that had no recorded historical past of any suicide-related on-line expertise (416 folks).

Odds ratios and relative danger ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) have been offered.


Between 2014 and 2016, there have been 595 suicides within the UK by these aged below 20 years; 544 of which had accessible demographic data, in addition to accessible medical, psychiatric, and social antecedents of suicide data. Of the 544 recorded deaths, 128 (24%) have been categorised as having had a suicide-related on-line expertise, of which most have been male (n=78) and aged below 18 years (n=77).

The commonest sort of suicide-related on-line expertise was trying to find details about suicide methodology, adopted by speaking on-line about one’s personal suicidal concepts or intent, with ladies extra doubtless than boys to have had a suicide-related on-line expertise previous to demise (32% in comparison with 20%, respectively). 6% of the pattern had skilled a number of suicide-related on-line experiences.

Younger individuals who recognized as LGBT, being in employment, and who have been bullied face-to-face have been twice as more likely to have had a suicide-related on-line expertise. Different vital antecedents amongst those that had suicide-related on-line expertise included: social isolation, neglect, bereavement (by suicide), prior self-harm, psychological sickness, and bodily well being issues.

24% of young people aged under 20 years who died by suicide in the UK between 2014 and 2016 had a suicide-related online experience prior to their death.

24% of younger folks aged below 20 years outdated who died by suicide within the UK between 2014-2016 had a suicide-related on-line expertise previous to their demise.


Findings from this examine counsel that suicide-related on-line experiences could also be a typical, however doubtless underestimated, antecedent to suicide in younger folks. This examine makes a major contribution to the literature exploring the connection between the web and suicide-related outcomes. Supporting the findings of earlier research (e.g., Gunnell et al., 2012, Mars et al., 2015, Padmanathan et al., 2020), 1 / 4 of suicide deaths on this examine have been related to suicide-related on-line experiences. Such findings strengthen the necessity to additional discover the kind of content material that younger folks share and are uncovered to on-line.

The authors of this examine pretty conclude that whereas some younger folks susceptible to suicide are…

utilizing the web to analysis doable strategies, talk their suicidal ideas and, to a restricted extent, search encouragement for his or her actions…. the precise steadiness between freedom of expression and public safety must be struck, while additionally acknowledging that the web could be useful for younger folks’s psychological well being and might play a job in stopping suicide.

Being conscious that the web could be each useful and dangerous is necessary when contemplating the function on-line security performs in suicide prevention efforts shifting ahead.

It is important to consider the suicide-related online experiences impacting young people.

The authors concluded that “the precise steadiness between freedom of expression and public safety must be struck” to stop suicide.

Strengths and limitations

By accessing such wealthy knowledge by means of inquest hearings, severe incident studies, and testimonies from these identified to the person who died by suicide, this paper has offered a major contribution to the literature and raises some necessary questions concerning the function of web experiences within the lead as much as a youngster’s suicide. The coding of suicide-related on-line expertise appears to appropriately signify the methods younger folks use the web for suicide-related functions, whereas counting on knowledge which are saved or retrospectively accessible.

A limitation of this strategy, nonetheless, lies within the high quality and availability of information accessible to researchers after a suicide happens. For example, after a confirmed or suspected suicide, younger folks within the UK had their gadgets looked for on-line suicide-related experiences, of which 41 people didn’t meet the 4 standards for an internet expertise as listed above, 14 had password-protected accounts, and 9 had just lately deleted all their knowledge. These 64 circumstances have been coded as having no on-line suicide-related experiences, which is kind of more likely to be incorrect. The absence of this data, notably in circumstances the place knowledge have been deleted, doesn’t imply that these experiences weren’t had, and doesn’t contemplate the varied methods younger individuals are identified to have interaction with this content material on-line (Brennan et al., 2022). Analysis with younger individuals who talk on-line about self-harm and suicide means that younger folks typically desire to have these conversations in temporal areas (e.g., Snapchat) that restrict their permanency and make it troublesome to seize such knowledge within the first place. A problem for all researchers inspecting this matter is the restricted entry to goal and correct knowledge concerning what somebody posts or is uncovered to on-line, notably in closed teams or extra personal areas. That is made tougher by the artistic (and arguably needed) methods younger folks use the web (e.g., completely different hashtags) to bypass web site or platform restrictions (Brennan et al., 2022; Samaritans, 2022).

This examine was unable to distinguish between useful or dangerous suicide-related on-line experiences, and the authors have been additionally unable to find out whether or not a youngster had used the web for help-seeking, and what function which may have performed previous to demise. That is additionally true of those that weren’t coded as having had suicide-related on-line experiences, and maybe these younger individuals who battle with suicidal ideas extra typically. Certainly, it might be that that they had additionally used the web to seek for normal psychological well being assist that didn’t meet the standards of ‘suicide-related’ searches.

Considering online interactions is important, however retrospectively gaining access to someone’s online conversation or search history is challenging.

Contemplating on-line interactions is necessary, nonetheless, retrospectively having access to somebody’s on-line dialog or search historical past is difficult.

Implications for observe

The literature helps the notion that our on-line interactions and the content material that we’re uncovered to have an effect on our psychological well being, each positively and negatively. As talked about above, our work has taken a hurt minimisation strategy by upskilling and empowering younger folks to put up about these subjects safely and really feel higher capable of navigate dangerous content material when they’re uncovered to it (see Robinson et al., 2018; La Sala et al., 2021; La Sala et al., In Press; Thorn et al., 2020). Nevertheless, while upskilling younger folks to maintain themselves and others protected on-line is necessary, it’s unfair to anticipate them to carry this accountability alone. Subsequently, it’s time to contemplate what extra governments and the social media trade could be doing to guard younger folks when interacting on-line.

Papers such because the one by Rodway et al. spotlight the significance of speaking to younger folks about their on-line interactions and the content material that they’re uncovered to, which could be notably necessary for younger people who find themselves struggling. The three ‘S’ phrases – suicide, self-harm, and social media – are troublesome subjects for fogeys and professionals to debate with younger folks. Having these conversations typically, and early, may mitigate damaging outcomes, and enquiring about on-line interactions must happen in each familial and medical check-ins.

Enquiring about a young person’s internet behaviour, what they are posting, and the content that they are exposed to is an important conversation for professionals and families to have regularly with young people.

Enquiring about a youngster’s web behaviour is a crucial dialog for professionals and households to have usually with younger folks.

Statements of curiosity

Louise La Sala and Jo Robinson are researchers on the #chatsafe mission, a program of labor designed to assist younger folks to speak safely on-line about self-harm and suicide.


Main paper

Rodway, C., Tham, S., Richards, N., Ibrahim, S., Turnbull, P., Kapur, N., & Appleby, L. (2022). On-line harms? Suicide-related on-line expertise: A UK-wide case collection examine of younger individuals who die by suicide. Psychological Drugs, 1-12. doi:10.1017/S0033291722001258

Different references

Arendt F, Scherr S, Romer D. Results of publicity to self-harm on social media: Proof from a two-wave panel examine amongst younger adults. New Media & Society. 2019;21(11-12):2422-42.

Baker, D.T., & Fortune, S. (2008). Understanding self-harm and suicide web sites: a qualitative interview examine of younger grownup web site customers. Disaster, 29 3, 118-22.

Brennan, C., Saraiva, S., Mitchell, E., Melia, R., Campbell, L., King, N., & Home, A. (2022). Self-harm and suicidal content material on-line, dangerous or useful? A scientific evaluation of the latest proof. Journal of Public Psychological Well being, 21(1), 57-69.

Dunlop SM, Extra E, Romer D. The place do youth find out about suicides on the Web, and what affect does this have on suicidal ideation? Journal of kid psychology and psychiatry. 2011;52(10):1073-80.

Gibson, Ok., & Trnka, S. (2020). Younger folks’s priorities for assist on social media: “It takes belief to speak about these points”. Computer systems in Human Habits, 102, 238-247.

Glenn CR, Kleiman EM, Kellerman J, Pollak O, Cha CB, Esposito EC, et al. Annual Analysis Overview: A meta-analytic evaluation of worldwide suicide charges in adolescents. J Little one Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;61(3):294-308. PMID: 31373003. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13106.

Gunnell, D., Bennewith, O., Kapur, N., Simkin, S., Cooper, J., & Hawton, Ok. (2012). The usage of the Web by individuals who die by suicide in England: A cross sectional examine. Journal of Affective Issues, 141(2–3), 480–483.

Hawton, Ok., Hill, N. T. M., Gould, M., John, A., Lascelles, Ok., & Robinson, J. (2020). Clustering of suicides in kids and adolescents. Lancet Little one and Adolescent Well being, 4(1), 58-67.

La Sala, L., Pirkis, J., Cooper, C., Hil;, N. T. M., Lamblin, M., Rajaram, G., Rice, S., Thorn, P., Zahan, R., & Robinson, J. (In Press). Acceptability and Potential Influence of the #chatsafe Suicide Postvention Response Amongst Younger Individuals Who Have Been Uncovered to Suicide: Pilot Research. JMIR Hum Elements. Accepted 2023 Mar 9.

La Sala, L., Teh, Z., Lamblin, M., Rajaram, G., Rice, S., Hill, N. T., …Robinson, J. (2021). Can a social media intervention enhance on-line communication about suicide? A feasibility examine inspecting the acceptability and potential influence of the #chatsafe marketing campaign. PloS One, 16(6), e0253278.

Lavis, A., & Winter, R. (2020). #On-line harms or advantages? An ethnographic evaluation of the positives and negatives of peer‐assist round self‐hurt on social media. Journal of Little one Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(8), 842-854.

Macrynikola, N., Auad, E., Menjivar, J., & Miranda, R. (2021). Does social media use confer suicide danger? A scientific evaluation of the proof. Computer systems in Human Habits Stories, 3, 100094.

Marchant, A., Hawton, Ok., Stewart, A., Montgomery, P., Singaravelu, V., Lloyd, Ok.R., Purdy, N., Daine, Ok., & John, A. (2017). A scientific evaluation of the connection between web use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in younger folks: The nice, the unhealthy and the unknown. PLoS ONE, 12.

Mars, B., Heron, J., Biddle, L., Donovan, J. L., Holley, R., Piper, M., … Gunnell, D. (2015). Publicity to, and trying to find, details about suicide and self-harm on the web: Prevalence and predictors in a inhabitants primarily based cohort of younger adults. Journal of Affective Issues, 185, 239–245.

Nasier, B., Gibson, Ok., & Trnka, S. (2021). “PM me” or “LOL”: Younger peoples’ observations of supportive and unsympathetic responses to misery on social media. Computer systems in Human Habits, 124, 106933.

Padmanathan, P., Bould, H., Winstone, L., Moran, P., & Gunnell, D. (2020). Social media use, financial recession and revenue inequality in relation to tendencies in youth suicide in high-income international locations: A time tendencies evaluation. Journal of Affective Issues, 275, 58–65.

Robinson, J., Cox, G., Bailey, E., Hetrick, S., Rodrigues, M., Fisher, S., & Herrman, H. (2016). Social media and suicide prevention: A scientific evaluation. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 10(2), 103-121.

Robinson, J., Hill, N. T., Thorn, P., Battersby, R., Teh, Z., Reavley, N. J., …Skehan, J. (2018). The #chatsafe mission. Growing pointers to assist younger folks talk safely about suicide on social media: A Delphi examine. PLoS One, 13(11), e0206584.

Samaritans. (2022). How social media customers expertise self-harm and suicide content material.

Thorn, P., Hill, N. T., Lamblin, M., Teh, Z., Battersby-Coulter, R., Rice, S., …Robinson, J. (2020). Growing a suicide prevention social media marketing campaign with younger folks (The #Chatsafe mission): Co-design strategy. JMIR Psychological Well being, 7(5), e17520.

World Well being Organisation. (2019). Suicide Knowledge 2019.

Yellow. (2020). Yellow Social Media Report 2020. Half One – Shoppers.

Photograph credit


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here